A glimpse into what government run healthcare will look like

November 10, 2009

The town I live in is running a program offering to vaccinate school aged children for the flu as well as H1N1. I’ve lived in this town over 17 years and am not sure why it is being done this year.

A letter came home from all the schools in September announcing this program, with the shots to be administered by a third party agency in the first week of October. The notice mentioned that this will just be the seasonal flu vaccine, and will not protect against H1N1. Shortly afterwards, we got another notice stating that due to a shortage, the schedule vaccinations will take place November 9 – 14.  Another notice came out stating that there will indeed be a H1N1 vaccine, but the seasonal flu vaccine will not be available. Furthermore, the H1N1 vaccine would not be a shot, but instead a nasal spray (much to the delight of my younger children. Finally, the first day of vaccinations and low and behold, the seasonal flu vaccine is available along with the H1N1, in both shot and nasal spray form.  Not only did they get the wrong information out to the families, but they had 3 chances to it correctly and still didn’t get it right. Do we want all of our healthcare run like this?

Due to the size of our town, the vaccines are to be administered based on your last name (A-F the first day, G-M the second etc.) Sound like rationing to anyone?

Additionally, the vaccines are to be administered between 2:00 and 7:00 at the high school. My daughter who attends the high school went to register for the vaccines immediately after school ended at 1:45. She got in line behind others, who were already in a line extending outside of the school. I know people who waited in excess of 2 hours for their children to be  vaccinated yesterday.

Furthermore, there is no fee to be paid at the time the vaccine is administered. It appears to be a free program, which many will indeed believe does not cost them anything. How much are taxes going to go up to run this program this year and into the future?

Our healthcare system is indeed in need of change, but I believe that the government should stay out of it.







Back in the saddle again

April 24, 2009

It sure has been a hectic past couple of weeks. Preparing taxes, kids on school vacation and securing additional negotiators has left precious little time for this blog. It then struck me that if I’m struggling with squeezing more items in my day than so must others.

Which got me thinking obviously about our negotiating service. I believe that anyone can negotiate their medical bills, just like anyone can negotiate what they pay for hotel rooms, airfare and new automobiles. The major stumbling block is most individuals do not know what a fair price is to offer their provider or what is fair to accept as a discount.

The founders of INSNET have been negotiating medical bills for over 20 years. We have the experience to not only know what a fair price to pay for services is, but also what dollar amount your provider has accepted from insurance in the past. With this information we base a settlement proposal and ensure you pay a fair price for your medical care.

I was recently reminded of an article our president Jack Gillis wrote for the Self Insurer years ago. The article references a Case Management Nurse who was looking for pricing information for a lymphadema pump. The homecare medical dealer was billing the insurance company $5,200.00. The Case Management Nurse  negotiated the price down to $2,300.00. Now most would say that the savings was fantastic. However, before she contacted the provider we informed her that the manufacturer had a suggested list price (not dealer cost) of $1,600.00 . In this case, the fanatastic negotiated settlement was a least a $700 overpayment. If a medical provider is able to negotiate a deal that great for themselves with a trained medical professional, just what kind of chance does the average citizen have?

How much time do you have to contact your medical provider with questions on your medical bill. The time you spend on hold can be an eternity. In fact I finally used my time well and wrote this post during my 14 minutes and 34 seconds I was on hold with a provider.


I feel your pain

March 27, 2009

I recently had an encounter with my daughters pediatrician office which showed a brief glimpse into the frustration many feel about our system of healthcare

About a year and a half ago my twelve year old daughter had her annual physical examination. My daughter’s pediatrician is a male and the office has a Physicians Assistant who is female. For several years my daughters have seen the PA for the exams, which is fine with my wife and I because the girls are more comfortable having a female examine them. During the physical the PA noticed something unusual about the curvature of my daughters spine. Her examination noted that the curve was a bit more pronounced then they would like to see at a child this age, she was concerned, but not overly so and figured it was something my daughter may grow out of. To be safe, she ordered x-rays at another facility and asked us to come back every 6 months for checkups.

In January I took my daughter to this checkup. The PA came into the room and we small talked for a minute or so and then she asked my daughter to stand up and bend forward at the waist so she could exam her. The PA used an instrument about the size of a ruler that had the middle hollowed out and ran it up and down my daughters spine. She did this twice and then showed me as well. This instrument is kind of like a level and apparently my daughters spine is now within the acceptable range of curvature, for which I am thankful. We were in the exam room less than 5 minutes, including the time small talking.

We left the office and a few weeks later I received a bill from the pediatrician. I have a high deductible plan, so I knew going in that I would be responsible for all costs involved in this exam. What shocked me was the statement from the pediatrician said that the exam was done by the attending pediatrician, not the PA. Common sense told me that a pediatrician should receive a higher reimbursement than a PA.  The statement also included CPT code 99212 and I was charged $77.00. Thankfully I know what the code means and it was the appropriate code, and the price for my geographic area was at about the 70th percentile, another words a fair price. My problem was with who gave the examination.

I contacted the billing company about this. The first person could not answer my question and offered to check with their supervisor and call me back. A few days later they called back and said they bill according to how my insurance company requires, which is to bill in the name of the attending pediatrician, even if he does not perform the exam. Furthermore, the biller stated that the code does not differentiate between the exam being done by a pediatrician or a PA. I was not satisified with this answer and asked to speak to the supervisor. Later that day they called and still did not give me an answer that satisfied me.

The pediatrician’s office is in network, which means the pediatrician agrees to write off a portion of the bill in exchange for increased volume from others who participate in this network. The statement I got from the pediatrician stated the billed charge was $77.00, which is fair, and the write off was $40.00, leaving me a balance of $37.00. I consider this a fair rate of reimbursement and have no problem paying this.

Our healthcare system is far from perfect and everyone needs to be alert about their bills. If you need assistance with a bill review or negotiation, contact INSNET.


We need to reform our attitudes before we can reform healthcare

March 18, 2009

Deloitte recently published a 2009 Survey of Health Care Consumers. Some of the findings are not surprising; 40% would grade the current healthcare system with a D or a F, a significant number of consumers have skipped care because they could not afford it, were not covered or thought the costs were too high and 53% believe employers should be required to provide health insurance for their employees.

The study also states that 7 in 10 say the would participate in a wellness program if they were given financial incentives such as reduced insurance premiums or monetary rewards. What is wrong with the 30% who would decline this offer? Everyone agrees the cost of health insurance is skyrocketing and needs to be controlled. The best way to lower the insurance premiums is to lower the bills the insurance must pay. Isn’t it easy to see if you are healthy, you will have less medical bills?  Participation in a wellness program will promote a healthy lifestyle and reduce healthcare costs. It just amazes me that 3 of 10 people surveyed have no interest in bettering their health, even if it puts money in their pocket. In this economy couldn’t we all use a little more in our wallet?


Common errors in medical bills

March 17, 2009

No matter how technologically advanced medicine becomes, billing remains mostly a data entry job done by human beings, who as we all know are prone to make mistakes.  Most of the errors found in medical bills are a variety of a data entry mistake.   All medical bills are generated based on a complex system of codes. Each medical provider has in their computer system a billable amount per each code. Below are some examples of medical bill errors.

A routine visit to your physician, a visit which includes about 10 minutes of face time with your doctor is usually given a 99212. For this code your doctor may have a charge of $95.00. Code 99215 includes around 40 minute visit and the charge could be around $300.00. The only difference in the code is the last digit, with the 5 being just above the 2 on a keypad. A small error by a billing clerk could result in an overcharge of over $200.00.

If a patient is receiving medication, the drug is dispersed in number of units. A billing clerk could accidentally key in 20 units instead of the 2 units the patient actually received. The use of surgical and  recovery rooms in hospitals are billed out on a flat rate for a given amount of time, usually 30 minutes. If you exceed this amount of time in the room there is a separate code for additional minutes. In a previous post I referenced the extreme time a hospital was billing for the use of a recovery room, which was later found to be a clerical error.

Another common error is for supplies or services which a patient never used. We once reviewed  a bill for a patient which had 2 pacemakers. The patient thankfully only received one pacemaker, but the hospital must keep a second one in the operating room in case of malfunction. A hospital employee failed to inform the billing clerk that the unused pacemaker was put back into inventory, and the clerk subsequently added it to the patient’s bill.

Some years back we reviewed a pharmacy supply bill for an insurance company. The pharmacy was billing out $7,412 for supplies. The problem was the supply charge should have been $412.00, not $7,412.00, a simple keystroke error that could have cost the payer dearly had it not been caught.

I just recently heard of this error where a patient was billed for the birth of a baby that wasn’t hers.

Now we get into the area where I tread very lightly, however it is a major problem; fraud. Estimates say that over $60 billion is paid annually in fraudulent healthcare bills. Most of the medical providers I’ve dealt with throughout the years are honest individuals, but obviously there are some out there looking to make a quick dollar.  I like to see the better side of individuals, however in the pharmacy example above, when we questioned the company about the error they stated that the 7 should have been the $ sign. Last time I checked, the $ sign is above the 4 not the 7….

Another issue especially with hospital bills is unbundling.  This should really be its own entry, but in summary it is the practice of billing for items which should be included within a code. For example if a hospital charges for suture removal following a surgery, and the removal of the sutures are included in the global fee for the surgery than the hospital is billing twice.

As stated before, it is very important that you review your bill for accuracy, even if you have insurance. In the example of the doctor visit, your insurance doesn’t know how long your visit was, they only know a contracted amount to pay per code on a bill. If you need professional assistance, contact www.myinsnet.com.